With the terrible pogrom that took place in my hometown, Amsterdam, and the ongoing Anti-Semitism in Europe, the United States, and indeed worldwide, it is time to give proper attention to one of the great mistakes of modern Jewish history. This is the myth that if Jews would only ânormalizeâ themselves, anti-Semitism would come to an end; that when Jews would have their own homeland, a government and army, live their lives like all the other citizens of this world and do away with their strange customs, they would then live in peace with their neighbors.
This constantly repeated mantra has proven to be entirely wrong and in fact, dangerous.
The celebrated liberal Jewish thinker professor Emile Fackenheim (1916-2003) is best known for his writings on the Holocaust and Jewish peoplehood. Discussing the Holocaust, Fackenheim states that it is no longer possible for Jews to deny their âsingularâ condition. The Holocaust has proven that as never before.[1]
Whatever the reason for this phenomenon, Jews have to stop deluding themselves that they are just one member in a community of nations. They are not and never were.
Secular Zionism made a fundamental mistake when it prophesied that once the Jews had their own homeland and state, anti-Semitism would end, and that there would then no longer be a need to remain Jewish. The creation of a secular Israeli nation would be sufficient to make Jews ânormalâ.
In perhaps his most quoted observation, Fackenheim states that the authentic Jew of today is forbidden to hand Hitler yet another posthumous victory: by assimilating. Since Hitler made it a crime to be a Jew and wanted to destroy the Jewish people, it is therefore an obligation for every Jew to make sure that he and his children remain Jewish. Fackenheim calls this the 614th commandment, over and above the 613 commandments of the Torah.[2]
The how and why of Jewish continuity
It is not entirely clear from the writings of Fackenheim why he wants the Jews to survive. It seems that he is saying that Jews have no other option. It is a force majeure. But as to why this should be the case, he does not elaborate. It is however entirely clear that the continuation of the peoplehood of the Jewish people is for him a sine qua non. The Jewish people is not allowed to disintegrate.
In fact, this was the foundation of classical Zionism and it is a basic assumption of nearly every Jew who lives in the State of Israel or is a member of a Jewish community outside Israel. It should be patently obvious to every Jew that however much he tries to turn into a non-Jew and assimilate, it will not work. He will always be a Jew even if he would be baptized. It is as if there is a subconscious awareness of Godâs word to the prophet Yechezkel: (20:32-34) âAs for what enters your mind, as for what you say, that we will be like the nations, like the families of the land, it shall not beâ¦â
Fackenheim struggles mightily with the question of how we can remain Jews when we are no longer observant. On the one hand he believes that after the Holocaust, it is no longer possible to remain fully religiously observant. After all, he believes that the conventional Jewish tradition does not have the wherewithal to solve the problem of Godâs existence and His responsibility for evil in the wake of the Holocaust. The evil of the Holocaust does not fit into any earlier category of ongoing anti-Semitism; it is unprecedented, and its barbarism cannot be compared to earlier pogroms and expressions of anti-Semitism. The Holocaust was an âepoch making eventâ, totally outside the realm of Jewish history. And it must be treated as such.[3]
As such, full traditional observance is no longer possible. Our world has to come to terms with a belief system that has been partially shattered by the Holocaust.
At the same time, Fackenheim fully realizes that without observance there will not be a Jewish future. The Jewish people will assimilate and disappear. All of his philosophical writings are imbued with this ambivalence.
Many Jewish thinkers do not agree with Emile Fackenheimâs assertion that the Holocaust is unique. While it is true that an unprecedented number of Jewsâfully a third of the global Jewish populationâwere slaughtered in the Holocaust, in no way was the actual evil different from many earlier pogroms. It did not create more of a religious crisis than any other catastrophe in Jewish history.
The Jewish tradition has dealt with the barbaric 210 years of slavery in Egypt, the destruction of the Temples, the evil of the Roman and Greek empires, the collapse of the early Jewish Commonwealth, the inquisition in Spain and Portugal and their numerous pogroms. The Holocaust is cut from the same cloth: it is just a link in a chain of ongoing barbarism.
Whatever differences these thinkers have concerning the Holocaust, they all agree with Fackenheim that Jews have an obligation to remain Jews.
The necessity of religious observance
The problem, however, is that Jewish history proves over and over again that the moment Jews stop being observant, assimilation sets in, and within a short period of time Jews stop being Jews and their grandchildren are lost to the Jewish people.
The question is haunting: Why stay Jewish when we reject the very thing that kept us alive for thousands of years as Jews? It is clear that Judaism and religious observance are responsible for our survival.
By creating a voluntary observance model, secular Jews can maintain their Jewish identity and pass it on to future generations. This approach allows for the preservation of Jewish tradition and culture without the need for a belief in God. It requires a shift in mindset and a willingness to engage in Jewish practices for reasons beyond religious obligation.
Through a ladder of observance, secular Jews can take incremental steps towards embracing Jewish traditions and values. This gradual approach allows for a deeper connection to Jewish heritage and a sense of belonging to the Jewish community.
While there are challenges and uncertainties in this approach, it offers a way forward for secular Jews seeking to maintain their Jewish identity in a meaningful way. By redefining what it means to be observant and embracing Judaism as a cultural and historical heritage, secular Jews can ensure the continuity of their Jewish identity for generations to come.
Regenerate
Assimilation is not merely a matter of intermarriage, but also a loss of Jewish identity. Nor is Jewish identity identical with Israelism. The very fact that there can never be an Israeli claim to the land of Israel but only a Jewish claim demonstrates that without Judaism there is no chance to keep our children Jewish. Where there is no continuity, there can be no return. Either we admit we returned to the Holy Land or there was no land to return to.
The secular Jew must make peace with these facts, however uncomfortable.
But if he does so, he will be a pioneer, he will have proven that Judaism is too great to be left to the religious. There is no greater compliment.
Notes:
[1] Emile Fackenheim, The Jewish return in History, NY, Schocken, 1978, p. 22.
[2] Ibid, p. 23.
[3] Ibid, p. 53-54.
[4] Yitz Greenberg, Voluntary Covenant, NJRC, NY, 1982.
[5] Abraham Joshua Heschel. God in Search of Man, Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, NY, 1955, p 283.
[6] Franz Rosensweig, On Jewish Learning, Schocken, NY 1955.
The post Judaism without God appeared first on David Cardozo Academy.
{Reposted
Regenerate means to restore or revive something back to its original state or condition. It can also refer to the process of growth or renewal after damage or injury.
Source link